Search for: "Playtex Products Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
Consumers are being told to discontinue using the pacifier holders and contact Playtex Products Inc. for a refund. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:56 am by Breakstone, White & Gluck
Playtex Hip Hammock Infant Carriers Playtex is offering parents a full refund after recalling a baby hammock-style carrier. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 4:05 am
Playtex Products Inc. et al., No. 1:08-cv-02703 (N.D. [read post]
Playtex Products that Munchkin (1) is being truthful in claiming that its Diaper Pail is “The NEW #1 in Odor Control. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:03 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property Playtex Denied Injunction Barring Competitor's Claims of Tampon's Superior Leakage Protection Playtex Products Inc. v. [read post]
The suits allege that Edgewell Personal Care Co., Playtex Products LLC and Sun Pharmaceutical, LLC (joint-manufacturers) knew that the products did not actually provide the stated SPF protection on their labels and have profited off these knowingly false statements. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
International Playtex, Inc., 821 F.2d 1438, 1442 (10th Cir. 1987); Foyle v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
Playtex Family Products Corp., 168 F.R.D. 292 (D. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:29 pm by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,923,789 owned by Playtex Products, Inc. and entitled MULTIPLE-COMPONENT TAMPON APPLICATOR. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:14 pm by Ron Coleman
Polo Ass’n, Inc., which favored the putative infringer, but the key issue there was the rules of evidence, not trademark; but in Playtex Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
Polo Ass’n, Inc., which favored the putative infringer, but the key issue there was the rules of evidence, not trademark; but in Playtex Products, Inc. v. [read post]